The Problem with Recovery Narratives
Recovery narratives rely on good behaviour from time.
This happened, then that happened, and eventually things improved. The story moves forward. The arc resolves. Everyone applauds politely and goes home feeling morally refreshed.
For many people, this structure is reassuring.
For others, it’s quietly punitive, like being graded on a syllabus you were never given.
The issue isn’t recovery itself. It’s the insistence that recovery must follow a recognisable narrative trajectory. That it must be progressive, visible, and legible from the outside. That improvement must look like movement, preferably in the correct direction, at a reasonable pace.
When time itself is compromised, these expectations become cruel. Stasis becomes failure. Duration becomes a moral flaw. Survival without transformation is treated as insufficient effort, or worse, a lack of ambition.
Some conditions do not move forward cleanly. Some lives proceed sideways. Some improvements are local rather than cumulative. Some stability does not lead anywhere else. It simply holds, which turns out to be unfashionable.
Recovery narratives are not good at holding this. They prefer milestones. They demand endpoints.
They require a before and an after, ideally with a clear turning point you can point to in retrospect and feel pleased about.
What they often obscure is the labour of maintenance. The work of staying intact. Of preventing collapse. Of managing time so it doesn’t overwhelm. This work produces no transformation montage. No final reveal. No satisfying sense that the story knows where it’s going.
It is nonetheless work.
Often Sisyphean.
Conditions like mine make this especially obvious, largely by refusing to cooperate with timelines. Progress may exist, but it doesn’t announce itself, and it rarely cooperates with timelines. A day that doesn’t end in catastrophe can represent an achievement, even if it looks indistinguishable from yesterday.
I’m interested in stories that can accommodate this without embarrassment. Narratives that don’t require redemption arcs. That don’t treat arrested time as failure, or demand that endurance justify itself with visible change.
If we can’t tell those stories, then a great many lives remain unintelligible.
And that seems less like a personal shortcoming than a design flaw.
Leave a Reply